In the modern digital landscape, where every online interaction leaves a lasting imprint, employers face a formidable challenge when their employees’ past actions or statements resurface on the internet.
This dilemma forces organizations to navigate uncertain terrain, and Thea Watson, Chief International Growth Officer at BrightHR, illuminates the intricacies of this predicament while offering practical strategies for employers.
Navigating the Digital Minefield: Employer Options
- Balancing Reputation and Fairness: Employers grapple with the dual mandate of safeguarding their hard-earned reputation and ensuring fairness in their actions. It is well within their rights to protect their image from potential damage arising from their employees’ historical conduct, including social media posts, even if these incidents date back several years. However, achieving equilibrium between reputation preservation and equitable handling of such cases is essential to avert potential legal consequences, such as lawsuits for unfair dismissal.
- Case-by-Case Evaluation: The response to instances of resurfaced employee misconduct should be tailored to the specific circumstances. In cases where there is no direct correlation between the contentious online content and the workplace, the grounds for disciplinary action may be limited. However, when a discernible link exists between the employee’s actions and the company, initiating disciplinary measures becomes a prudent course of action.
- Clearly Defined Social Media Policies: Proactively establishing a comprehensive social media policy is a crucial step for employers. This policy should outline the expected standards of conduct for employees when using social media platforms, even during their personal time. Effective communication of this policy ensures that employees are well-informed about the company’s expectations concerning their online behavior.
- Policy Violations and Due Diligence: Employers have the prerogative to conduct due diligence when an employee’s online activity breaches company policy. Investigation of the matter is justified, and disciplinary actions should be taken when warranted. Even in cases where no formal written policy exists, employees may still be held accountable for actions that could detrimentally impact the company’s reputation.
- Assessing Impact on Reputation: The potential impact on the organization’s reputation is a critical factor to consider when evaluating the gravity of an incident. This aspect becomes particularly relevant if the content implies company endorsement of inappropriate behavior or casts a negative light on the organization.
- Consistency Over Share Count: Setting a specific threshold of share counts that triggers disciplinary action is a challenging proposition for employers. Such an approach risks inconsistencies in the treatment of employees. Therefore, it is advisable to maintain consistency across all cases, irrespective of the virality of the online content.
- Informed Decision-Making: Employers should exercise due diligence by thoroughly examining all the facts pertaining to each case. This involves delving into the context and nuances of the situation before determining the most suitable course of action.
In an era where the past remains eternally accessible, employers face the arduous task of balancing their reputation with equitable employee treatment. Successfully treading this delicate path involves not only the establishment of a well-communicated social media policy but also a nuanced approach to addressing historical online content.
Keep up to date with our stories on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
