Government blocks Fair Work Commission independence by banning penalty rate absorption models that could simplify Australia’s complex 994-rate retail award system.
The Labor government is introducing legislation that will prevent Australian businesses from negotiating with employees to absorb penalty rates into higher base salaries, even when workers would receive substantial pay increases.
The new Fair Work Act amendments, introduced as one of parliament’s first bills this week, prohibit any arrangement where penalty rates are incorporated into base salaries – regardless of whether employees would be financially better off under such arrangements.
Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth announced the legislation responds to Fair Work Commission cases where employers sought to modernize pay structures, but business groups warn the intervention undermines workplace flexibility and productivity at a critical economic moment.
What this means for your business
The legislation directly targets current Fair Work Commission applications, particularly from retail employers seeking to offer simplified salary arrangements. Under the new laws, businesses cannot offer employees the choice to trade penalty rate structures for higher, more predictable base salaries.
For the retail sector alone, this affects potential arrangements for workers covered by the General Retail Industry Award, which the ARA says currently spans 96 pages and includes 994 different pay rates. The complexity creates significant compliance challenges, particularly for smaller businesses trying to navigate payroll obligations.
Workers like retail employee Daniel, who relies on $85 weekly in penalty rates to supplement a $600-700 base wage, would be prevented from opting into alternative arrangements that might offer greater income security through higher salaries.
Industry response
The Australian Retailers Association has labeled the move as government overreach that contradicts productivity objectives. ARA CEO Chris Rodwell argued their Fair Work Commission application offered a “commonsense option” with a 35% base salary increase for retail managers choosing annualized salaries.
“This application is absolutely consistent with the government’s stated intent when it initiated the FWC’s independent review of Awards,” Rodwell said. The ARA proposal included safeguards and never sought to remove penalty rates from awards entirely.
The intervention comes just weeks before the government’s August productivity summit, creating what Australian Industry Group CEO Innes Willox calls “dark irony” – fast-tracking legislation that reduces workplace flexibility while seeking productivity improvements.
The ARA warns the decision “runs contrary to the government’s stated ambitions to lift productivity in this term of government, dampening expectations and putting the conversation on labour productivity in reverse.” Rodwell argues this reflects how “Australia’s industrial relations environment fundamentally fails to support business investment and entrepreneurship.”
For businesses, the legislation means continuing to navigate what the ARA describes as Australia’s complex award system rather than accessing simplified salary structures. The ARA says the retail award’s 994 pay rates create particular challenges for smaller operators, with “Australia’s largest retailers find it difficult to navigate” while “our smallest retailers find it near impossible to interpret.”
The government’s preference for enterprise bargaining as an alternative creates additional costs and administrative burdens for small to medium businesses. As the ARA notes, enterprise bargaining “imposes additional costs, complexity and administrative pressures, further straining employers already navigating significant challenges in today’s economic climate.”
Businesses in retail, clerical, and banking sectors that had applied to the Fair Work Commission for modernized pay arrangements will need to withdraw applications or face certain rejection under the new legislation.
Strategic implications
The penalty rate protection laws signal Labor’s ideological commitment to collective bargaining over individual workplace flexibility. This approach prioritizes union objectives and traditional award structures over business-led innovation in employment arrangements.
For business leaders, the legislation represents a broader challenge: Australia’s industrial relations system is becoming less responsive to modern workplace needs while adding regulatory complexity. The government’s intervention in Fair Work Commission independence also raises questions about the predictability of future workplace relations policy.
The laws are expected to pass easily with Greens support, meaning businesses should prepare for continued complexity in award-based employment arrangements while exploring enterprise bargaining options despite their additional costs and administrative requirements.
The ARA argues this reflects a broader challenge where “Australia’s industrial relations environment fundamentally fails to support business investment and entrepreneurship,” warning that “improvements in living standards will be elusive if we don’t face into this problem.”
Keep up to date with our stories on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
