Dynamic Business Logo
Home Button
Bookmark Button

$31,000 penalty for company that underpaid visa workers

A business has received a large fine after failing to pay workers.

The Fair Work Ombudsman has secured $31,590 in penalties against Rockhampton-based business Alertvale Pty Ltd that underpaid two Filipino visa holders $9,931 when it made them redundant. The company operates businesses providing services in the mining and heavy industry sector in regional Queensland.

In February 2016, Alertvale terminated the two workers’ employment effective immediately. The company failed to fully pay their owed payment in lieu of notice of termination, and failed to pay any of their four weeks’ redundancy entitlements. Alertvale also unlawfully deducted $1,915 from the two workers’ wages for training.

Both workers, employed as welders, were Filipino nationals and had been sponsored by Alertvale on 457 skilled migrant visas for more than a year. The underpayments were rectified 16 months after the contraventions occurred, after the company was contacted by Fair Work inspectors.

Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker said the penalty should serve as a warning to all employers to pay employees the redundancy entitlements they are owed.

“If companies don’t pay termination entitlements it can have a significant impact on employees, depriving them of a crucial safety net until they obtain a new job,” Parker said.

“We treat matters where employers fail to provide basic lawful entitlements to vulnerable employees very seriously. Every single worker in Australia has the same workplace rights, regardless of their visa status, ethnicity or linguistic background.”

Judge Harper noted that the company had increased in size from about 180 employees in August 2016 to more than 350 employees in March this year, but still did not have a dedicated human resources department.

“[Alertvale] operates in the mining and heavy industry sectors which are known for experiencing downturns which lead to redundancies and terminations like those experienced by the Employees,” Judge Harper said.

In issuing the penalty, Judge Harper said general deterrence was “of fundamental importance to deter those employers who may be tempted to exploit the specific vulnerabilities of employees reliant on their employers for the ability to remain in Australia.”


What do you think?

    Be the first to comment

Add a new comment

Gali Blacher

Gali Blacher

Gali Blacher, editor, Dynamic Business

View all posts