Yonatan Bley warns businesses risk wasting resources on AI that creates complexity instead of efficiency. His five-step framework helps you choose tools that actually deliver results.
What’s Happening: Businesses face mounting pressure to adopt AI tools, but many are discovering the productivity revolution creates more complexity than efficiency.
Why This Matters: Bley’s five-step approach offers businesses a practical method to separate genuinely valuable AI from expensive distractions, ensuring investments deliver measurable returns within realistic timeframes.
The promise of artificial intelligence sounds compelling: smarter customer service, faster administration, more time for business growth. Yet for many organisations, the reality falls short. Teams juggle multiple platforms, processes fragment across systems, and the anticipated productivity gains never materialise.
According to Bley, this disconnect stems from purchasing decisions driven by trends rather than need. “Too often, businesses purchase technology because it’s trending, not because it addresses a bottleneck,” he explains. The fix requires asking one fundamental question before any investment.
Problem first, tool second
Bley recommends starting with clarity about manual tasks requiring elimination. Whether reconciling invoices, managing customer queries, or scheduling staff rosters, the specific problem should define the solution. This approach prevents accumulating technology that solves problems businesses don’t actually have.
The variety of available AI tools presents both opportunity and risk. Without strategic direction, companies add layers of complexity whilst pursuing efficiency. Frustrated team members and fragmented workflows become the unintended outcome.
One pilot at a time
Real-world testing requires focus. Bley advocates piloting one tool at a time with clear success criteria. “Is it saving staff hours? Is it reducing errors? Is it improving customer response times?” he asks. Isolating trials creates clean data for measuring impact.
Simultaneous pilots muddy results and overwhelm staff, reducing adoption likelihood. By concentrating efforts, businesses gain accurate insights into whether specific tools deliver promised benefits or simply add noise to existing systems.
Training determines success
Even promising AI solutions fail when employees lack proper training to use them effectively. Bley emphasises incorporating training not just during initial rollout, but as ongoing professional development. “Embedding AI into everyday processes ensures it becomes a natural part of workflow rather than a forgotten icon on the desktop,” he notes.
Tools only prove as effective as the preparation given to those using them. Investment in staff capability determines whether technology transforms operations or becomes another unused subscription draining budgets.
Measure or move on
Return on investment serves as the critical indicator of tool value. If AI doesn’t reduce workload or improve customer experience within three to six months, Bley recommends moving on. Software-as-a-service models mean switching costs are lower than ever.
Businesses can measure AI effectiveness by linking tools to clear business goals such as efficiency, cost savings, revenue growth, or customer satisfaction. Tracking both quantitative KPIs like error reduction and faster processing, alongside qualitative feedback from staff and customers, provides comprehensive assessment.
“Businesses should treat AI adoption as a cycle of experimentation—test, measure, refine, or replace,” Bley states. This iterative approach prevents organisations from remaining locked into underperforming solutions out of sunk cost thinking.
The framework Bley outlines prioritises real problems over trending solutions, careful piloting over rushed adoption, staff training over assumption of intuitive use, and clear measurement over hopeful waiting. In environments where every dollar and hour counts, this disciplined approach helps small businesses harness AI as an engine of efficiency rather than a source of complexity.
For businesses feeling overwhelmed by AI options, the path forward requires stepping back from the hype cycle. By focusing resources on solving specific bottlenecks, testing methodically, investing in capability building, and demanding measurable results within defined timeframes, companies can separate tools adding genuine value from those simply adding noise to already busy operations.
Keep up to date with our stories on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
