LinkedIn, TikTok, Meta and four others are all cracking down on fully AI-made content, says Billo’s Donatas Smailys, and fast.
If you’ve been leaning on AI to pump out social content faster and cheaper, seven major platforms just made that a lot riskier. Independently and without coordinating, LinkedIn, Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, Meta, Google and Reddit have all rolled out measures in recent months to limit, label or demote content made entirely by artificial intelligence.
The approaches differ, but they land on the same rule. Content shaped by a real person keeps its place in the feed. Content with no human input anywhere in the process gets pushed down, flagged, or left to the community to police.
The platforms that demote
LinkedIn moved first among this group, adding a “seems like AI slop” report button to posts on 30 July, giving users a direct way to flag content that reads as machine-written. The company also retired its own AI “enhance your post” writing tool, replacing it with a proofreading feature designed to fix grammar without changing a user’s voice.
Snapchat followed two days later, making fully AI-generated videos ineligible for recommendation on Spotlight, its short-form video feed. Videos edited or enhanced using Snapchat’s own AI tools still qualify, and still carry transparency indicators.
YouTube had already moved earlier in the year, terminating 16 channels with a combined 35 million subscribers under a renamed “inauthentic content” policy targeting mass-produced, templated videos with no human creative input. The company later clarified in July which kinds of AI-assisted content remain eligible for monetisation, drawing a line between wholesale automation and genuine AI-assisted production.
The platforms that label
TikTok has taken a different route, requiring visible labels on AI-generated visuals and audio that depict realistic people or scenes, including in ads and branded content. Scripts, captions and hashtags written with AI help are exempt from the labelling requirement.
Meta made AI disclosure mandatory and automatic on Facebook and Instagram ads from 1 June, scanning ad media and applying labels to anything made or edited with generative AI, whether Meta’s own tools or a third party’s. Advertisers can’t opt out, and undisclosed AI content has become one of the more common reasons ads get rejected, with repeat breaches escalating to account suspension.
Google switched on a “How this ad was made” panel across Search, YouTube and Discover from 9 July.
Reddit’s different approach
Reddit stands apart from the other six. It has no platform-wide AI policy, leaving enforcement to individual subreddit moderators who set their own rules. It’s the clearest example among the seven of people doing the moderating rather than an algorithm.
Donatas Smailys, CEO of Billo, a UGC marketplace connecting brands with creators, says the shift is forcing a rapid rethink of how brands approach content production.
“Everyone chased AI because it made video almost free to produce. What they missed is that it raised the cost of getting that video seen, as well as the cost of getting it wrong,” Smailys said.
He pointed to Europe’s new transparency rules as part of the backdrop. Under Article 50 of the EU AI Act, which came into force on 2 August, businesses reaching EU users must disclose AI-generated ads and deepfakes, with fines reaching up to €15 million or 3 percent of global turnover, whichever is higher, for non-compliance. Smaller businesses and startups face a lower ceiling.
“Social platforms are already demoting or labelling the same content that regulators are now fining brands for,” he said.
What this means for you
For brands running paid social, the practical test is simple: how much of this creative was actually made by a person. Content with no human involvement at any stage is being penalised across all seven platforms, whether that means reduced reach, a visible label, or leaving it to users to flag.
Of the two main approaches, disclosure looks the most likely to spread as detection technology improves. TikTok, Meta and Google already require labels on AI-generated ads, while LinkedIn, Snapchat and YouTube have built their own detection systems working from the other direction. Together, that leaves two things that matter for anyone producing paid social creative: a real person needs to be involved in making it, and AI use needs to be disclosed wherever a platform requires it.
“What platforms are actually cracking down on are ads made entirely by AI, without a single person touching the process, especially the ones running an AI-generated performer instead of a real one,” Smailys said. “It’s different if you use AI to brainstorm, edit, write captions, or speed up the boring parts of production. What matters the most is the real person has to be on camera.”
Keep up to date with our stories on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.